False Flaggotry
The simulacrum of opposition
Many have the uneasy sense that something isn’t right about our modern world, a natural response for those inhabiting the Empire of Lies that is the Judeo-liberal West.
From the toxic stew of state-sponsored informational and psychological warfare waged against the White world has bubbled up a culture of conspiracy theorising. From a genuine and well-placed distrust of Western institutions has emerged a totalising epistemological scepticism. The conspiracy theorist thus calculates that because some things are fake, everything must be fake.
In our Trumpian world of WWE-style political kayfabe, conspiracy theorising is the perfect vehicle for wannabe dissidents to rage against the machine while being fed into it like human bio-fuel. The conspiracy theorist is akin to the human battery slaves of The Matrix who dream of dissent inside their amniotic bath as the machine harvests their life energy for its own nefarious ends.
It is common now to hear accusations of “false flag” resonating in the wake of any politically-charged event. The latest example was the killing of two Israelis, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim in Washington DC by leftist Elias Rodriguez. That the gunman shouted “Free Palestine” is a sure sign that the event was somehow designed to provide cover for the US Government to crack down on protesters opposing the Jewish genocide in Gaza.
That the US Government is already cracking down on them, violently in the case of the college campus protests, is conveniently elided. As the global superpower with a self-justifying monopoly on violence, the US can arbitrarily define any group as terrorists and proceed accordingly. The federal government did not require a false flag in order to justify enforcing racial desegregation and forced busing at bayonet point, they just did it.
What is perhaps so perplexing for the right-wing conspiracy theorist is that there exist ideologues willing to engage in direct political violence rather than posting online about what political violence they might do in a hypothetical world which conveniently never materialises.
Modern conspiracy theorising is a simulacrum of dissent in which ersatz revolutionaries wage a pseudo war against a political system from within that system’s ideological paradigm, never transgressing its boundaries of political correctness. The conspiracy theorist is an anti-revolutionary in revolutionary garb who by reifying the current ideological paradigm has their dissenting energy arrogated by the very system they claim to oppose.
A prime example is the Danish conspiracist Ole Dammegård. In public talks on his theories of elite global control and false flags, he is careful to first frame his worldview within the current post-war liberal paradigm.
“I’ve spent 30 years of my life really trying to expose what is going on, not because I’m paid by anyone…”, he begins, explaining that his motivation lies purely in his Christ-like love of peace, unity and compassion. He continues:
“I come from a family that was very much involved in the Resistance movement against the German occupation here [in Northern Europe]. My dad was in the Resistance movement and my granddad was in jail for…smuggling Jews to Sweden […].”
The small elite, a few thousand in number, “do not care about us at all. We are just useless eaters, as they so poetically call us. And that’s not okay with me.”
So who is this elite? Cue the next slide with a picture of Adolf Hitler and the title What is real power? Dammegård explains:
“We’ve got this guy who came to a point of what is called power. Now, was it because of his incredible hairdo or the stylish moustache? What happened? How did he come to a point where he made so much mayhem in the world? […] What was the thing that made him change the history of the world for the worse?”
He implores his audience to “study history” in order to “see what is going on in our beautiful countries nowadays when more and more of the [Dammegård feigns a Roman salute] is coming in through the backdoor. Scary times if you don’t wake up I tell you…”.
In a rather ironic turn, his next slide features former US diplomat Henry Kissinger, a Jew who fled Germany in 1938. The accompanying quote from Kissinger, allegedly from a speech given to a Bilderberg meeting, explains how individual rights will be gladly relinquished if the public fears an outside threat to their safety.
Of Kissinger, Dammegård says that “when it comes to war criminals [he] would be on a scale higher than Adolf Hitler. He should put a moustache on and maybe they could, you know…”. There is no mention of Kissinger’s race in this context.
He then goes on to explain the many false flags throughout history, including the Reichstag fire of 1933 which “got Hitler into power”, Operation Himmler which involved a fake Polish invasion used as a pretence for starting World War Two, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the beheading of British soldier Lee Rigby, Sandy Hook and 9/11. Pulling the strings are the ubiquitous Freemasons who, for some reason, are trying to make White people racist by staging murders of Europeans by Blacks.
Dammegård’s argument is one familiar to both left and right: the global elite is bad and must be fought because they are like Hitler and fascism. The system is tricking you about everything, except the fundamental premises from which the system derives its moral legitimacy. Mistrust mainstream information sources, except when they tell you Hitler is the personification of evil for persecuting Jews — a myth imposed by the very elites against whom you are supposed to be fighting because they are like Hitler. Thusly is the conspiracy theorist is trapped in a schizophrenia-inducing maze of incoherency.
This pablum serves an important role: to obfuscate the real conspiracies, of which 9/11 is the sine qua non. It is public knowledge that several Israeli Jews were arrested in the wake of the 2001 attacks on the Twin Towers, of which some seemed to have prior knowledge. The extent of their involvement in 9/11 through the front company Urban Moving Systems remains somewhat opaque but evidence strongly suggests Israeli intelligence played a role in the attack which killed almost 3,000 people.
That 9/11 was the catalyst for America’s invasion of numerous Middle-Eastern countries in the so-called War on Terror adds fuel to the fire of suspicion, especially as it occurred in the wake of the largely Jewish-authored Clean Break policy paper. This document called for a new Middle East in which Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was removed from power and Syria greatly weakened. In a 2004 survey, some 49% of New York City residents said they believed the US government was complicit in 9/11 [1].
Conspiracy theorising is thus promoted as a way to drown out legitimate dissent in the white noise of ridicule. This tactic was officially formulated by the Jewish legal scholar Cass Sunstein as cognitive infiltration designed to “introduce informational diversity into [extremist] groups and to expose indefensible conspiracy theories as such” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], p. 204). Among the many problematic conspiracy theories cited includes “the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers are responsible for the deaths of presidents and for economic distress in Asian nations” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], p. 205).
Sunstein’s main concern is conspiracy theorising over 9/11. He explains:
“Our focus…is on demonstrably false conspiracy theories, such as the various 9/11 conspiracy theories, not ones that are true or whose truth is undetermined. Our ultimate goal is to explore how public officials might undermine such theories…” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], p. 206)
He cites a 2006 Canadian poll in which 22% of respondents believed that the attacks on the Twin Towers had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden and were actually a plot by influential Americans [1]. However, the most shocking conspiracy theories promote the idea that 9/11 was the work of the US or Israeli governments [1]. Additionally:
“In China, a bestseller attributes various events (the rise of Hitler, the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998, and environmental destruction in the developing world) to the Rothschild banking dynasty; the analysis has been read and debated at high levels of business and government, and it appears to have had an effect on discussions about currency policies. Throughout American history, race-related violence has often been spurred by false rumors, generally pointing to alleged conspiracies by one or another group” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], p. 203).
Those who espouse “false, harmful, and unjustified” conspiracy theories do so not because of mental illness but a “crippled epistemology” in the form of “a sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], p. 204). Instead of political authorities denying the conspiracy, cognitive infiltration requires that the informational isolation of self-enclosed conspiracy networks be breached and the zone flooded. This amounts to informational divide and conquer by “introducing beneficial cognitive diversity” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], p. 219). Social pressure will then be exerted on the non-conformists to cease espousing such views in order to mitigate reputational damage and social sanctions [1].
The tactics that can be employed to this end are made explicit:
“Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic, or implications for action, political or otherwise” (Sunstein & Vermeule [1], pp. 224-225).
Conspiracy theories about UFOs or the moon landings may be largely ignored by authorities, and perhaps even promoted, as they do not form a premise for action in the same sense as 9/11 conspiracy theories which identify a distinct group (i.e. Jews) who can be politically organised against [1].
By pathologising legitimate concerns over conspiracies by state actors, academics are then empowered to study such a phenomenon in a self-referential loop of legitimation. Researchers who interpret conspiracy theories “such as that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an inside job” then ask, “[w]hy do so many people around the globe believe conspiracy theories, and why are they so influential?” (van Prooijen & van Vugt [2], p. 770).
In answering this question, Jewish academics like Douglas Hofstadter [3] have attempted to pathologise American society, arguing that US Gentile psychology is particularly fertile ground for “heated exaggeration, suspiciousness and conspiratorial fantasy”.
More empirically minded researchers attempt to analyse conspiracy theorising within the framework of evolutionary psychology [2]. It is argued that conspiracy theories are a “by-product of a suite of cognitive mechanisms (e.g., pattern perception, agency detection) that evolved for different reasons” and that “conspiracy thinking is an adaptive feature of the human coalitional mind that evolved (a) to alert ancestral humans to the possibility that others were forming dangerous coalitions against them and (b) to stimulate appropriate actions to fend off such threats” (van Prooijen & van Vugt [2], p. 771).
It is argued that conspiracy theories exhibit five core traits: 1) an assumption of connectivity between people or events (a pattern), 2) deliberate plans on behalf of the conspirators, 3) a group of actors working in conjunction with each other, 4) an element of threat such that the goals of the conspirators are harmful, and 5) an element of secrecy [2].
What distinguishes conspiracy theorising from supernatural beliefs is a hostile coalition of deliberate actors [2]. Common conspiracies circulating online involve “powerful groups such as societal leaders, governmental institutions…influential branches of industry…or stigmatized minority groups (e.g., Muslims, Jews)” (van Prooijen & van Vugt [2], p. 771).
Conspiracy theorising is considered to be an evolutionary adaptation which provides “functional solutions to problems of survival and reproduction that evolved through natural selection because they provided better survival prospects than alternative solutions in ancestral environments” (van Prooijen & van Vugt [2], p. 771). This interpretation is buttressed by the fact that conspiracy theories feature key cognitive functions such as pattern recognition, agency detection, alliance detection and threat management [2].
According to the adaptivity hypothesis, conspiracy theorising uniquely assisted ancestral humans to better navigate their social world by successfully anticipating and overcoming imminent environmental dangers [2]. It is reasoned that:
“[I]n an environment in which coalitional violence—that is, violence committed by actual conspirators occurring both within and between groups—was a common cause of death and reproductive loss, it may have been adaptive for people to be suspicious of the possibility that other people were forming malevolent conspiracies against them or their group” (van Prooijen & van Vugt [2], p. 774).
Detecting secret conspiracies — and potentially overcognising them — before they come to pass may invoke emotional and behavioural responses that mitigate such threats via defensive or offensive actions [2]. Suspicion of conspiracies against the in-group would have given early humans an evolutionary advantage in resource competition [2].
Intergroup conflict is characterised by strong feelings of in-group cohesion, a sense of superiority in comparison to others and derogation of out-groups [4]. In respect of anti-semitism, major predictors are the extent to which Jews are considered a threat to one’s own nation and belief in conspiracy theories involving Jews [5].
Conspiracy theories are particularly salient among so-called stigmatised minority groups [2]. Conspiracy theorising flourishes “particularly among cohesive minority groups that are marginalized by the dominant majority coalition” (van Prooijen & van Vugt [2], p. 780).
Even if conspiracy theorising was historically adaptive, it is argued that in modern times such views have potentially negative consequences such as intergroup conflict, aggression and radicalisation [2]. A tendency to excessive conspiracy theorising is a common trait of paranoid schizophrenics [6]. Genetic studies suggest that Ashkenazi Jews may be more prone to schizophrenia via the NDST3 gene [7].
Conspiracy theorising is evolutionarily adaptive in promoting a sense of suspicion that external actors are working to undermine one’s own group, something that Jews well understand. Jews are the ultimate conspiracy theorists. Their entire mythical canon from the Old Testament to the ‘Holocaust’ is designed to foster a sense of in-group paranoia that promotes adaptive behaviours rooted in in-group preference and out-group suspicion. The work of Hofstadter and Sunstein is designed to stigmatise and ultimately extinguish such behaviours among Gentiles, while perpetuating them for Jews.
Conspiracy theorising is a natural and evolutionary adaptive instinct, one which is intrinsic to the American zeitgeist. The real false flag is the attempt to discredit belief in a Jewish conspiracy against the White race in the service of Zionism.
[1] Sunstein, C.R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202–227.
[2] van Prooijen, J-W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770-788.
[3] Hofstadter, R. (1966). The paranoid style in American politics. New York: Knopf.
[4] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
[5] Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-semitism in Poland. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 213–229.
[6] Harrison, P.J., & Weinberger, D. R. (2005). Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Molecular Psychiatry, 10, 40–68.
[7] Lencz, T. et al. (2013). Genome-wide association study implicates NDST3 in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature Communications, 4, 2739.
"Jews are the ultimate conspiracy theorists."
So the master conspirators are paranoid of imagined conspiracies devised by those they conspire against. No wonder they are schizos.
Interesting that they themselves view conspiracy theorising as a potentially positive adaptive trait. I had never considered it in this fashion. Thanks for this.